All together 🏠
How do we make it even bigger? · 8 min
Tools for bringing people closer
How does «us» get bigger? · 10 min
Tools for bringing people closer
How does «us» get bigger? · 15 min
Each age has its own progress. People of the same age share this space and its logbook in this browser.
What happens when the reds and the blues have to do something together?
Thanks for sharing. You're not the only one.
- Doing things together makes the team bigger. When kids from different groups play on the same team, they become friends. When they only play against each other, not so much.
- Your voice helps. When one kid says «don't make fun of him!», others find the courage to say it too.
- Getting to know families. When you meet the family of a friend from another country, you find out they love each other just like yours.
- Being on your team is fine. You can love your soccer team and be friends with someone who supports the other one.
Bigger or smaller?
Mixing teams at recess.
Answer
🤝 Bigger. You play on the same side.
Making up a song to make fun of the other class.
Answer
🙈 Smaller. Someone is going to feel sad.
Saying «don't make fun of him!».
Answer
🤝 Bigger. Others find courage.
Clapping only for your team's goals and booing the other team's.
Answer
🙈 Smaller. It's the booer trick.
Lía's school is having a family festival. Every kid brings a food, a song or a game from home.
Andrés's daughter brings bread from her country. Martín brings a card game from his grandma. Sofía teaches a song.
Lía tries everything. At the end of the day, she tells her mom:
—Today we were all one team.
Food from around the world 🍲
With the adult, look for a food, a song or a game from another country or region. Make it or play it together.
Just for the adult: children learn to see «others» as people when they meet them and do things with them, not just when it's explained to them. Look for chances for your child to play on mixed teams and get to know families different from yours.
Ask a classmate what food they like at home.
What did you discover about a friend's family?
Five tricky situations!
Finish and go to lesson 8 →Stopping a meme matters. But «them» truly falls apart when «they» stop being strangers.
Thanks for sharing. You're not the only one.
- Getting to know someone helps, but crossing paths isn't enough. You have to get to know each other. (Paluck, Green and Green, 2019)
- Better on the same team. People from groups that didn't mix made friends when they played on the same team, not when they played against each other. (Lowe, 2021)
- Your friends' friends count. Knowing that someone from your group is friends with someone from the other group already improves how you see them. (Wright et al., 1997)
- Your voice changes the atmosphere. In 56 schools, a few influential students said publicly that fighting and conflict weren't okay. Conflicts in their schools dropped by about 30% in a year. (Paluck, Shepherd and Aronow, 2016)
Many people don't agree with hatred, but keep quiet because they think they're the only one. When one person speaks up, others find courage.
Brings closer or pushes apart?
A tournament with mixed teams from both schools.
Answer
Brings closer. You play on the same side.
An «us against them» match full of insults.
Answer
Pushes apart. It reinforces «them».
Inviting the new classmate to play.
Answer
Brings closer. You get to know them as a person.
Keeping quiet when everyone mocks someone.
Answer
Pushes apart. Contempt looks normal.
Saying «okay, stop».
Answer
Brings closer. Others find courage.
Teo invites his cousin Mateo to watch the derby at his house. Each in his own shirt.
They shout at the goals, throw cushions, make fun of the referee together.
At the end of the game, Mateo says:
—I've never watched a derby without ending up in a fight with someone.
A bridge
1 · Choose someone from a group on your map.
2 · Choose something to do together, on the same side.
3 · Write the first step.
Take the first step on your bridge.
What's harder for you: reaching out to someone from «them», or speaking up in front of your own?
Six real-life situations.
Finish and go to lesson 8 →Sources for this lesson
- Paluck, E. L., Green, S. A. and Green, D. P. (2019). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 129–158. View source: Paluck, E. L., Green, S. A. and Green, D. P. (2019). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 129–158.
- Lowe, M. (2021). Types of contact: A field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1807–1844. View source: Lowe, M. (2021). Types of contact: A field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1807–1844.
- Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. and Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90. View source: Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. and Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90.
- Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H. and Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 566–571. View source: Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H. and Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 566–571.
Stopping a comment matters.
But «them» truly falls apart when «they» stop being strangers.
Thanks for sharing. You're not the only one.
Getting to know someone helps, but crossing paths isn't enough
On average, contact between people from different groups reduces prejudice. But in the strictest studies the effect is smaller than is usually claimed, especially when it comes to origin or skin color. (Paluck, Green and Green, 2019)
Passing each other in the street isn't enough. You have to get to know each other.
Better on the same team
In India, a researcher set up cricket leagues with men from groups that barely mixed. Some were put on mixed teams; others only played against the other group. Those who played on the same team made more friends and favored their own less. Those who only played against each other didn't. (Lowe, 2021)
Facing off isn't the same as building something together. A neighborhood game, a project at work, a community work day, a shared meal.
Your friends' friends count too
Just knowing that someone from your group has a close friend from the other group already improves how you see that group. (Wright, Aron, McLaughlin-Volpe and Ropp, 1997)
That's why your friendships aren't only yours: they also teach your family and friends that «them» has faces.
One conversation can change a lot
Conversations of about ten minutes, in which people were invited to remember when they themselves had been judged and to put themselves in the other person's place, reduced a prejudice. The effect was still there three months later. (Broockman and Kalla, 2016)
Correct what you think they think
As you saw in lesson 3, we tend to think the other group hates us more than it does. And showing people what the other side really thinks was among the things that most helped lower hostility. (Moore-Berg et al., 2020; Voelkel et al., 2024)
Often, hatred is an idea about the other side that nobody checked.
Your voice changes the atmosphere
In 56 schools, a few influential students took a public stand against conflict and fighting. In their schools, conflict reports dropped by about 30% in a year. (Paluck, Shepherd and Aronow, 2016)
And in Rwanda, years after terrible violence between groups, a radio drama about two neighboring communities changed what listeners saw as normal: more trust, more cooperation, more willingness to speak their minds. Interestingly, it changed little of what each person privately believed. It changed what they felt free to do. (Paluck, 2009)
Many people don't agree with hatred, but keep quiet because they think they're the only one. When one person speaks up, others find courage. Like the moms in the class chat.
Brings closer or pushes apart?
A neighborhood game with mixed teams.
Answer
Brings closer. You build something together, on the same side.
A game of «locals against outsiders».
Answer
Pushes apart. It reinforces «us against them».
Inviting the family of the neighbor who came from another country for a meal.
Answer
Brings closer. You get to know each other as people, not as a group.
Watching news about «them» every night.
Answer
Pushes apart. What you see most is what divides most.
Asking someone from the other side what they really think.
Answer
Brings closer. It corrects what you thought they thought.
Saying «that's not okay» when everyone is laughing.
Answer
Brings closer. Others find the courage to think differently.
Keeping quiet so you don't look bad.
Answer
Pushes apart. Contempt looks normal.
«Us» grows by doing things together, talking and finding the courage to speak up.
The neighborhood organizes a soccer game to raise money to fix the square. Teams are drawn by lot.
Sam ends up on the same team as Andrés and Julián, a neighbor who supports the rival club and whom Sam has never even said hello to.
At first they each play on their own. In the second half, Andrés passes to Julián, Julián to Sam, and Sam scores.
The three of them hug.
After the game they eat together. Julián says he works at the same hospital where Tita was treated. Andrés says that in his country he was a math teacher.
On the way home, Teo asks Sam:
—Isn't he one of the rival fans?
—Yes —says Sam—. He's Julián.
A bridge
A few minutes to plan it. The week to do it.
Step 1 · Choose a person or a family from a group on your map of «them».
Step 2 · Choose something to do together, on the same side.
Step 3 · Write the first step. What will you say or do to suggest it?
Step 4 · Your voice. Write a place where you know contempt seems normal, and what you'll say next time.
Take the first step on your bridge: a hello, an invitation, a question.
What's harder for you: reaching out to someone from «them», or speaking up in front of your own?
Now you have tools to stop hatred in the moment and to make «us» bigger.
In the next lesson you'll test them in six hard situations: the neighborhood chat, the family table, your child repeating an insult… and a real wound that makes you distrust a whole group.
Finish and go to lesson 8 →Sources for this lesson
- Paluck, E. L., Green, S. A. and Green, D. P. (2019). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 129–158. View source: Paluck, E. L., Green, S. A. and Green, D. P. (2019). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 129–158.
- Lowe, M. (2021). Types of contact: A field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1807–1844. View source: Lowe, M. (2021). Types of contact: A field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1807–1844.
- Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. and Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90. View source: Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. and Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90.
- Broockman, D. and Kalla, J. (2016). Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science, 352(6282), 220–224. View source: Broockman, D. and Kalla, J. (2016). Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science, 352(6282), 220–224.
- Moore-Berg, S. L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.-O., Hameiri, B. and Bruneau, E. (2020). Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26), 14864–14872. View source: Moore-Berg, S. L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.-O., Hameiri, B. and Bruneau, E. (2020). Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26), 14864–14872.
- Voelkel, J. G. et al. (2024). Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity. Science, 386(6719). Find reference: Voelkel, J. G. et al. (2024). Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity. Science, 386(6719).
- Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H. and Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 566–571. View source: Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H. and Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 566–571.
- Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574–587. View source: Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574–587.
Lesson 7 of 10.
You're doing well.
To take with youAsk a classmate what food they like at home.
To take with youTake the first step on your bridge.
To take with youTake the first step on your bridge: a hello, an invitation, a question.
What you write and your progress are saved only on this device. When you finish the lesson we add 1 to the total, without knowing who you are.